todo
- hugo and git article
- structured data format for bibliography
- structured data format for glossary
- structured data format for “knowledge graph” (source, notes, etc)
preliminary curation
over the next two weeks
- add books / readings we like
- each skim asynchronously find highlights we like, share them back with each other; surface and articulate what we like about the passages (topics, themes, motivations etc.)
- chat about the order of the syllabus
- convene in two weeks to finalize
misc notes
- anchoring in indigenous perspectives
- Question, I get my indigenous perspectives from podcasts, and my basic workflow is to just listen and keep in touch with myself while I see what resonates, then some things stick. I boil those down to simple understandings I can actually impliment in my life. Then I impliment them and see how things change. Can this process be a part of our identity group? It’s very non-academic.
- legibility; disappearences in Argentina;
- *-nymity (anonymity, pseudonymity and more)
- prioritize forkability, interfaces for people to get together and run with the idea
- adjacent events and resources
- the question of hashtags and other digital identity-ish constructs: what are they?
can we incorporate some natural lifecycles into the process? forking etc.? sunsets? as needed
fundamental meta-question: is “this” a “study group” or an inclusive participatory study process with healthy lifecycles and regenerative aspects, with coming and going, freedom, joy, etc
Spencer Notes
I find the hardest psrt is to have a point to the group. I propose we take enough time to state what we think our identities are. First we could say where we come from, then how we are connected into the world now, and perhaps lastly we talk about our understanding of what the borders of identitiy are to each of us. What say you?